5 Top Tips for Resilience Planning

5 Top Tips for Resilience Planning

When people build a house, some form of protection, they wouldn’t dream of tackling the job without a plan. So why is it that so many people tackle their everyday challenges, with no protective plans in place at all?

In this piece, I will set out what my experience has shown are the 5 key elements of personal protective planning, more often called simply “resilience”. So, what exactly IS resilience? Why is it such a great idea … and how can you get yourself some?

The online Oxford dictionary defines resilience in two ways, which in my world actually seem quite related:

  • The capacity to recover quickly from difficulties; toughness.
  • The ability of a substance or object to spring back into shape; elasticity.

So, when dealing with clients, I help them find inner “toughness” and the ability to “bounce back” from difficulties. See how I think they combine? What this means in practice is that I work with clients to identify the real scale of the challenge at hand, and to learn to see that challenge from a range of angles. How could it be an advantage? How could they learn from it? How could it affect others? In other words, to encourage the client to move on from the pit of indecision where they find themselves, and to explore different ways of seeing what they had begun to feel would be an insuperable problem.

Obviously, this isn’t a quick process for everyone, and isn’t about giving the client a metaphorical slap round the chops accompanied by a stern “Pull yourself together!”. Clients will have different levels of trust in others, even in themselves. Many people are so accustomed to catastrophising that they are experts, coming up with generalised negativity on such a grand scale that nothing is ever possible, in the history of everything, ever! When I get to know clients well, I have been known to term this “flouncing”. It is completely unproductive, and yet so very common in people, in work and at home. Many people will actually doubt they ever had any inner toughness. And that may be the case in some, but not for many.

This may be striking an uncomfortable chord for you as you read this. Well don’t worry – you are in plentiful company. And the fact that you are reading this at all shows that you have made the first, most important step – noticing that where you are now is not where you want to stay. Congratulations. That shows that you have inner toughness … you just need to nurture it.

How can you nurture your resilience? Firstly, by noticing it. Every time something happens where you would prefer things to happen differently, you will begin to notice that you are having to make a choice: go with it, or resist. Start to focus on how you do what you do, and how you think what you think. Don’t worry about why yet, just focus on the how. Notice, and reflect upon, your responses to different stimuli, be they a request to work unpaid overtime, or an invitation to go to the pub with your mates.

“Going with it” is not the same as giving in – let’s get that straight. Going with the general flow, showing personal flexibility, which is key to personal resilience. In other words, you have to begin to recognise where to pick your fights. In extreme situations, the flexibility can go too far and there is a “snap” – back to that elasticity definition again. So the second tip is to keep flexible. The NLP presupposition “the most flexible, wins” (I paraphrase) will help you to judge when it is in your interests to go with the flow, and when it is not. It might help to get an important project done, to work a long day. It might be unhelpful to go to the pub with mates the night before a big exam. Flexibility is not always straightforward, but it is important that you understand the terms under which you are using yours. Learn what works for you.

Next comes the recognition of boundaries. The third element is to recognise boundaries, ie where the “snapping point” is, and to learn to take action to avoid things getting to that stage. You need to understand the boundaries of a situation, to help you to gauge how flexible you need to be. If your boss is inviting you to stay every night to keep him company in the local bar, that’s an easy boundary to spot. You make an excuse and avoid, or go now and again if it suits you. If that becomes bullying pressure to lose control of your consonants with him, every week, that is beyond flexibility and is a straight “no” – well at least it was for me many years ago. Notice your personal response to this scenario. You may be feeling a range of emotions, positive and negative. These responses will pull on your value system, your upbringing, your beliefs, corporate policies, personal commitments … all of these things inform your boundaries and the intensity with which you choose to reinforce them. However, the ability to recognise your boundaries is a crucial tenet of improving your personal resilience.

Once you know how you are feeling about a situation, and you can see how others would like you to respond and how you might in turn respond (based on a conscious choice whether to go with it or resist), you have, in fact built the foundations of your own resilience. Next comes understanding. So the fourth tip I want to pass on, is empathy – to learn to see things from others’ perspectives. The old saying “you won’t understand someone until you’ve walked a mile in their moccasins” has a ring of truth about it. You don’t have to want to be the other person, nor am I encouraging you to sympathise with their situation, pitying them or “taking their part” as people used to say. Instead, I am simply suggesting that seeing things from another viewpoint helps you to understand a situation more fully. The more facts you have about a situation, the better you can respond to it appropriately. Imagine … someone in the office has been out all week, you jokingly accuse them of “skiving” on their return, it goes quiet in the office, someone informs you that your colleague was recently bereaved. You can sense the awkwardness, caused purely by not making the effort to find out more, to see a situation from another’s viewpoint. Empathy, then, is a key leadership skill, and an excellent way to protect yourself. You can understand someone’s situation, but you don’t have to join them in it! Self-protection is a crucial underlying technique to shore up your resilience. “Look after yourself” is not an encouragement towards selfishness, so much as a recommendation that you may need to be strong for others, so you need to be strong enough to do that in the first place.

I am sure when you read this you can come up with a range of alternatives to my top tips, but for me, the fifth and perhaps most important tip is maintenance. There is minimal benefit to you, to be resilient … then not … then resilient … then not again. Using the previous four tips, you can learn what works for you, in terms of making you identify as more resilient. Once you have this learning, find a way to make it stick. Perhaps you could associate it with an image, either in your mind’s eye or one of those motivational photographs so beloved of those of us who post aphorisms. Perhaps you could associate it with a sound, or word, or a sensation or emotional response that you feel able to conjure up on demand. You might even be like me and associate it with a smell, a positive scent, a favourite perfume. And then there’s always associating your resilience with a taste (although I wouldn’t advise linking it to alcohol as that is a path strewn with trouble … see above!). Whatever device you use, use it. Think about it often and in as much detail as you can. Repeat it. Learn to be able to create that sensory impression at the drop of the proverbial hat. That will enable you to build your resilience to the extent that you outgrow the image, word, feeling etc. You will naturally become more resilient, because you are reinforcing your learning and applying it to new situations. You will grow and improve. And then you can use the tips all over again!

If this all rings true for you, and you think that this is something that you would like to explore in more detail, then please feel free to get in touch. I would love to hear from you, and help you find out what other tips and techniques would work for you, on your personal development journey.

Why bother employing anyone 50+?

Why bother employing anyone 50+?

Why bother employing anyone 50+?

It is common sense that older people have longer years in the workplace and therefore have more experience than their younger colleagues. However, for some reason, employing organisations appear to find it difficult to choose to capitalise on that experience, when it comes to retaining and valuing older workers. So, let’s take a look at a few of the attributes that older workers have to offer.

First of all, older people are statistically more likely to have worked longer in an organisation than their younger colleagues. Staying with the same employer (although not necessarily in the same job) is something which has become less usual in the UK in recent years, but it used to be the norm. “A job for life” was not a throwaway line; it was the real expectation for generations of employees. So, leaders need to bear that cultural change in mind. It takes time for people to notice, appreciate, understand and then respond to a changing work climate. Telling them there is no such thing as a job for life isn’t enough. The effective leader will note an employee’s loyalty over the years and recognise its value. Older people with long work track records will have a detailed knowledge of the history of their workplace. They may not realise the level or value of this knowledge.

An effective leader will recognise how to tap into this, to find out how to capture the germ of a profitable idea.  They will also avoid wheel-reinvention.  They may even uncover where previous leadership teams have buried their “skeletons”. This latter can be particularly helpful in assessing business risk and avoiding employment lawsuits. Better to face an issue than to try to hide it; the truth will out, as the saying goes. All the better to be seen by your workforce to address issues and seek the truth actively. This sends a clear signal that transparency and truth are prized. This can often have a significant contribution to ensuring a workplace is happier and more productive.

Older workers also have “seen it all before”. Although that phrase is often synonymous with cynicism, it actually is a potential resource of knowledge. These workers will know who tried what, what wasn’t tried, what has worked elsewhere. They are people who probably live locally to their work and are part of the community … they are a font of potential knowledge which often remains untapped. What stops managers and leaders tapping into this knowledge? Sometimes it is pride, sometimes it is distrust based on the apparent cynicism, sometimes it is pure laziness. What stops managers and leaders is, therefore, their failure to invest their own time to listen, and to learn. That failure costs organisations dear.

A role which older workers often fulfil in workplaces (whether they seek it or not) is as the office elder – the wise advisor. This is the plus side of having “seen it all before”. Older people have done just that – they have seen similar situations, they have faced similar challenges, and they had developed strategies and responses which can be helpful to their younger colleagues. Sometimes, of course, those responses have been shaped by stress-avoidance. However, in the main, their experience of similar situations means they can advise younger colleagues how to keep calm, how to make their point a different way, how to build positive working relationships. So many of the leadership gurus who publish online quote or cite learned colleagues and older teachers (Goldsmith cites Drucker, Covey cites Frankl, for example). Older workers can fulfil this function in their workplace.  If you recognise them as doing this – and even equip them with more training to do this formally, you can have effective and experienced in-house coaching. It can be as simple as that. And the potential benefits are many and varied. Here are a few:

  • better staff retention (all ages) through a happier workplace;
  • better skills transfer and knowledge retention;
  • positive inter-generational working to make the most of everyone’s skills;
  • more ambassadors in the community for the employing organisation (67% workers in empowered workplaces are proactive ambassadors for their employer).

That’s not a bad list of benefits from simply acknowledging that older workers have seen and done lots – and making use of it.

In many industrial sectors, skills which were taught in workplaces are not taught with the same intensity, as technology has taken over and skills have had to be amended. However, these “old” skills are now coming back into demand. There are several reasons for this: the rise in artisan/niche businesses; the ongoing need for high quality practical skills which technology cannot replicate; ironically, the increased demand by the growing older population for things to be done “properly” (ie using the skills they recognise as valid). For instance, the belated search for sustainability has led to a welcome renewed focus on these “traditional” skills, in tandem with cutting-edge technology, to reduce our dependency on dwindling natural resources. In practice, this results in older workers being re-hired, to return their “traditional” skills to the workplace when those skills were difficult to find in younger workers. Skills scarcity is starting to focus the attention of astute leaders. It should. As the workforce ages, unless there is effective skills transfer within organisations, these “traditional” skills will disappear.

In addition, as the community ages, organisations’ customer base attaches increased importance to having something in common with their service suppliers, retailers and so on. Although reverse-ageism is not great, it is an uncomfortable truth that there can be a degree of chauvinism among older people about young workers, new into the workplace and yet to acquire significant skills and expertise. A way to counteract this is to challenge it if it occurs in the workplace, and use inter-generational working and knowledge-transfer to improve the levels of mutual understanding and respect. However, beyond the workplace, older customers will value being able to deal with someone who has shared similar life experiences.

There is also the simple factor of the benefits of a thriving and diverse workplace. Difference brings interest, stimulation, innovation, opportunity. This applies to any difference, whether that be age, heritage, faith or any of the other ways in which people choose to describe and categorise themselves. That diversity brings a rich range of resources to the workplace. It is an effective leader who recognises the benefits of tapping into those rich resources, for the benefits of their workforce, and for their customers.

It is important to remember that age, as with other comparative measures, means different things to different people. Many of the points I have made here could equally apply to a workforce from different ethnic backgrounds, or with different physical or intellectual capabilities, or of different genders. Wait a minute … isn’t that simply an everyday workplace these days? So why bother employing anyone over 50? Why even ask that question? The question that we should be asking is, ”Who’s the best person to employ for that job/task/team/organisation?” Age shouldn’t be an issue. Leaders have enough to cope with – why add to it by inventing more things to stress about?!

You may find that some of the issues I have discussed here sound familiar. If you have experience of the benefits of older workers, I would love to hear from you in the comments below. However, you may have found that some of these issues rang true for your own organisation. If this is the case, please get in touch and we can have a conversation about how you can make the changes you want.

The tale of the old dog and the old tricks

The tale of the old dog and the old tricks

We all know of the adage “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks”. When you stop to think about it, however, this is just plain silly. When it is applied to older people, and highly-experienced older workers in particular, however, it is just plain insulting.

It does, however, appear to feature in a leading school of thought, exemplified below in a quote from the UK Commission for Employment and Skills. It suggests that older workers need to continuously update their knowledge and skills – the onus is on them.

(more…)

The “ticking time-bomb” 20 years on

The “ticking time-bomb” 20 years on

I have written previously about the term “ticking time-bomb”, when used to refer to the anticipated economic difficulties which a large (or even majority) population of people aged 50+ becomes a real issue, with pension payments outstripping the taxation levels designed to fund them.

Although I had realised the term was a little hackneyed, I had not realised that this phenomenon has been known about in government, academic and professional circles for over 20 years. This means that an assortment of politicians, civil servants, academics and financial professionals have all known about this problem, and many have been working hard to devise workable solutions, since the 1990s.

The outcome? Different organisations and institutions have worked separately (sometimes together) but still the problem remains … and the preferred solution from the current national government is to remove pensions for all but a very few at a low level of entitlement, in the coming 20 years. I will refrain from comment the merits or otherwise of this approach. What I aim to do in this piece, is to introduce a series of posts which all focus on a central theme: the sustainable workforce in the sustainable workplace, and the positive role that older workers ought to have at the heart of a growing UK economy in the future.

Anyone in employment aged 50+ is viewed and termed an “older worker” but in fact may have a further 18 or so years to work before any formal entitlement to state pension materialises. So why is it that so few companies operate effective and well-regarded age management strategies within their companies? B&Q, Airbus, Barclays are all names mentioned for building older workers into their workforce for their intrinsic value. There are, however, only a handful in the UK … as far as we know. If, while you are reading this, you start to bristle because your organisation respects, values and deploys older workers in a positive and productive way, PLEASE shout about it in the comments below. You need to raise your company profile for this, believe me.

What I mean by “sustainable workforce” is a workforce which, despite its members ageing, remains agile and market-responsive. Specifically, it does this not by shedding people to keep its workforce ever younger, in the mistaken belief that the latest tech’ gimmick will be their corporate salvation. Rather management value the workforce as individuals and also as a cohesive group where everyone celebrates its diversity. It would also be an environment where the sum of its parts really does add up to a lot more than the whole. In this workforce, older workers with long years of experience and expertise would buddy younger workers. They could transfer knowledge and skills – both ways. This is not Silver Surfers-lite. This is a strategic business decision to retain longer term investment and make sure it is deployed for the benefit of the organisation’s financial and operational health. In this way, age management is put to the core of the organisation’s culture, not to address a problem so much as to celebrate, protect and capitalise upon a rich asset.

By “sustainable workplace” I mean one where everyone has a role to play, which they understand, and which everyone respects because they felt engaged by a shared culture. The obvious cliche is the NASA janitor who, when President John F Kennedy asked him what he was doing, responded, “I’m putting a man on the moon, Mr President”. It has a core of truth in it, however. A workplace is sustainable if it works well based on shared values, principles, attitudes, norms. These are shared, but not uniform. Different perspectives are vital to prevent a sterile working environment, which stifles innovation. Too often a workplace will feel increasingly hostile to older workers (and remember that’s anyone over 50). A significant percentage of 50+ workers leave the workplace through stress. Much of this has been shown to be age-related anxiety due to pressures put on workers by colleagues and management. This is unpleasant for the workers – and very, very costly for employers and the taxpayer.

A work colleague I know celebrated their 50th birthday and some wag bought a cake, decorated with a “Zimmer” walking frame and a cartoon of an aged decrepit person on the icing.

Did this make you smile?

Would it, if it was your cake … and you didn’t see yourself as old at all?

This could be laughed off as a joke, and as a 50+ with a false hip I do get the gags and make them about myself. However, if this caricature becomes a workplace norm, it is tedious and it could also indicate something more sinister. It could be insidious ageism in the workplace where older workers are not valued, with those aged 50+ equated to those aged 80+. It seems obvious, but 40 year olds aren’t normally lumped into the same group as ten year olds, are they? So why make the assumption that 50 and 80 are so similar? When you stop to think about it, it’s bizarre … and a bit silly. So let’s stop this ageism – and please also remember it’s all relative. There are millions of extremely fit, healthy and active people around aged well in excess of 80 years. Our children are likely to live on beyond 100 … think about it …

The modern workplace needs to be valuing older workers, not because of their age, but because of what that age has permitted them to acquire: skills, experience, expertise, knowledge, connections … and a lot of good ideas for new and better ways of doing things yet. Just think how successful organisations could be, if they harnessed all the resources at their disposal, instead of discarding them due to outmoded and business-limiting prejudice.

I would be interested to hear people’s views on this

If you’re interested in how I would address this in your organisation, please get in touch so we can have a conversation.

 

Relax, listen … and lead

Relax, listen … and lead

Leaders and managers can be too caught up in concerns about HR legal red tape to adopt a mature approach to workforce management. Age Management is a positive move, which recognises expertise. It’s only ageism when done badly.

Many companies in the UK are afraid of getting their workforce management wrong. For some the whole “HR thing” is a threatening minefield full of expensive regulations and even costlier tribunals – best keep your head down and hope no-one moans. Thankfully, for the vast majority, there is an understanding that any organisation’s best asset is its people. However, that understanding appears to wane when it comes to older workers. Sometimes they are viewed with suspicion – they know where the corporate skeletons are buried, so need to be made to feel so uncomfortable that they leave. Sometimes they are viewed as a burden, with younger managers struggling to empathise with the experiences of people sometimes twice their age, so older workers are excluded from developmental opportunities … and feel so unwanted that they leave. The point is that neither of these approaches is leadership. It isn’t even management. In truth, it is incompetence. In my introductory post to this series of items on older workers and how to make the most of this “goldmine”, I addressed the issue of organisations’ complacency in the face of a demographic “time bomb”. In this post, I want to tackle the dreaded “-ism” that many managers fear … ageism ….simply because they don’t really understand it. Age is one of the nine protected characteristics of the 2010 Equalities Act, against which policies and services should be evaluated. Failure to do so is not simply a failure of leadership; it is potentially unlawful. No leader worth their salt should proceed with any organisational change without conducting an Equality Impact Assessment (EIA). However, no leader worth their salt should proceed with that change based on the avoidance of trouble either. They should be looking at the resources at their disposal and deploying them to their best effect. That is where age management comes in (and this wonderful Dilbert cartoon is a cracking of example of how NOT to do it, of course …). To manage a workforce’s diverse skills and expertise is to be competent; it gives any organisation the best possible opportunity to thrive. Additionally, it offers everyone in that workforce the opportunity to contribute (and thrive) at a team and individual level. That diversity holds much of an organisation’s operational riches. There will be people with drive and lots of ideas; there will be people who bring others together and encourage teamwork; there will be people who look after the detail and make sure everything is as right as it can be; there will be people who sell well; there will be people who administer well… you take my point. Workers are capable of these attributes aged 16, or 86 and beyond. It all depends on the person involved – and how their skills are used, valued and combined with the skills of others to craft a cohesive offer. Obviously there are some jobs where youth and physical competence are required, and as workers age they may find such jobs difficult or even impossible. However, their inability to lift heavy weights, for instance, should not be allowed to negate all their other skills and experience. An effective leader will review their organisation as a whole (systems thinking is a major strand of programme management, but could be argued to be a leadership plan for life). Seeing where skills can be deployed, rather than finding a place to hide someone whose initial attributes don’t appear to fit any more, makes more sense on business and human levels. In other words, an effective leader manages their resources; they manage the impact that age has on their workplace…they use an “age management” approach. So why don’t more leaders follow this path? Many aren’t leaders – they manage, fire-fighting and being driven by the need to response not proactive action. These people will cite the lack of time at the front line to tackle such issues, or blame senior management for a failure of leadership, or … .  They need to have a look at Covey’s 7 Habits. For some, who do show leadership in other spheres, the fear of appearing discriminatory means that they respond as if caught in the proverbial headlights, and take the apparently easier path of losing expertise from the workplace. How is losing an expert resource, the product of years of expensive investment, the easy path? Happily, for a growing number of leaders, in all sorts and sizes of organisations, the preferred path is actually the simplest: talk with your older workers and help them to plan their future. By identifying that they still have something to contribute, you break down most of the old ageist barriers in one action; listening. I address the issue of older workers feeling valued, and the differences this can bring to the workplace, in a later post. However, to return to my Covey recommendation: #5 – Seek first to understand, then to be understood. It’s a simple thing, which might take a bit of time and effort (not least because if this is a new approach in your organisation, there will be a bit of suspicion that it’s too good to be true!). However, the best way to identify the resources at your disposal as a leader is to find out as much about their potential as you can. Workers aren’t widgets – they can talk and, if asked the right questions, using a coaching approach, they can tell you what they know, want … and what they have to offer. How about making the most of that rich vein of information, mine it and make informed business decisions which protect your investment as a result? Some workers will want to leave, but having had a meaningful conversation about their future, they will feel more able to be ambassadors for your organisation, rather than retiring amid feelings of rejection and worthlessness. For those workers who choose to remain and contribute their wealth of expertise to your organisation, you have the chance to use that expertise in new ways, bringing positive, workforce-led change to your workplace. Best of all you can introduce a skills-transfer programme, where older workers help to train younger workers in what they know, including perhaps “traditional” skills which are coming back into demand. This will make other workers recognise the importance of their older colleagues in terms of the contribution they can make, which in turn will contribute to a more tolerant (and, as a byproduct, happier and more productive) working environment for all. So relax into effective leadership, and be confident you are doing the best for your workforce, your organisation, and you. It won’t be all plain sailing. There will be new behaviours to develop, possibly on all sides. However, a coaching approach encourages a supportive and empowered workplace. The CIPD found in a survey that 84% companies found in-house manager-coaches effective. That’s great. If your organisation doesn’t have such things (yet!), the CIPD also found that 92% companies found that external coaches were effective. So, you have little to lose in adopting a coaching approach to communicating with your older workers, and so very much to gain. Some of my points in this article may have hit a nerve. If they have and you want to comment, please do below. If they have and you want to discuss how you can explore doing things differently, please get in touch and let’s have a conversation.

Image courtesy of Canva

“Timebomb” or “goldmine”?

“Timebomb” or “goldmine”?

“Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don’t mind, it doesn’t matter” Mark Twain

Sadly, for most older people in work in the UK, it does matter … but perhaps not always to them.  The age for retirement is increasing, and it feels like it is creeping higher every year.  This is creating a workforce across the UK, in all sectors, where people are staying in the workplace longer than perhaps they ever envisaged they would.  This is sometimes described as the “ticking timebomb” because of the retirement costs, but it ought to be treated like a “goldmine”.

Ageing poses challenges for the workers and also their management.  For some employees, working until “age of retirement” and extending beyond that formal date is a source of joy, friendship, stimulation, reassurance and sometimes even of personal identity.  For others, it feels like a millstone, stuck in a job managed by people half their age, who don’t understand them and treat them like a geriatric.  I caricature these extremes to make the point, although recent academic research* shows that these attitudes are still depressingly common all over Europe.

For employers and management, an ageing workfoce is a reality, but one which amazingly few organisations are actually doing anything to address (other than the age-old restructuring ploy).  The majority really are missing a huge trick.  They have a wealth of experience and skills, the result often of years of their organisation’s investment, within their teams, but for a range of reasons (some not so savoury), that experience and those skills don’t always balance out the perceived downside of having older people in the workforce.  Sure it can mean that you have staff who may not be able to perform physically demanding roles into their 60’s and beyond, but does that really mean you can’t use their skills elsewhere, doing something to keep their abilities, and all that investment, inside your business?  It won’t be long before the UK workforce age profile will have shifted to a level where the average is over 40 years of age (the Office for National Statistics says the average is 39.7 at the moment).  This will have a profound and costly effect on UK employers if they don’t prepare for it, but it could just hold the key to market advantage if they do.

Coaching can maintain motivation and focus for older employees.  It can also help managers to understand and use more flexibly the skill set at their disposal.  By understanding the options involved, being focused on performance goals for staff and management alike, and by sharing a commitment to involve older workers in the future success of organisations, coaching can underpin how to get the best out of people at all levels.  It can bring fresh and innovative thinking, it can restore missing “corporate memory” and it can improve productivity by making best possible use of all the skills and resources available.  Most of all, it helps organisations to recognise their employees as individuals, all of whom have huge potential and value, no matter their age.

If your organisation has an older workforce, and this blog makes you stop and think, then great. Congratulations!  You just made it into the wise minority.  The next step is to contact an experienced organisational coach to discuss how best to make use of the fantastic staff resource you have at your disposal.  You will be amazed and delighted by the successes that your workforce will bring to your organisation … just set them free with coaching and a positive corporate approach to their value.

You won’t regret it.  Get in touch to discuss how I can help you with that.

 

 

* The academic study to which I refer: Richard Ennals & Robert H. Salomon (eds.) Older Workers in a Sustainable Society  ISSN 1861-647X I SBN 978-3-631-61480-8 © Peter Lang GmbH

Image:  Public Domain Pictures from Pexels